There is really nothing to write about at this time other
than the ongoing carnage in our nation as a result of angry young men (always
men!) shooting up their schools, most recently (at least at the time of this
writing) with the death of 17 students and teachers at Marjory Stoneman Douglas
HS in Parkland, FL. It is hard to write through the tears. This should not be
going on. Many people have written pieces on the subject -- sad, or angry, or
articulate, or all of these. One of the most moving appeared in the New York Times on February 18, 2018, by
a man named Gregory Gibson whose son was killed in a school shooting 25 years
ago. The online headline, “A
message from the club no one wants to join”, is different from, and in this
case is much weaker than, the print headline: “Why wasn’t my son the last victim?”
Why indeed? Twenty-five years ago. And since then, countless
school shootings, and other mass murders (such as, if we needed reminders, the Las
Vegas country music concert, the Pulse nightclub in Orlando and the First
Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs, TX) have occurred, and every parent,
every family member, wants to know why the most recent prior child to die was
not the last, instead of their child. People are terrified; a friend, a
rational physician, embarrassedly admits to looking online for Kevlar backpacks
for his children. He does international “mission” work and is taking his
14-year old daughter to Africa; when people ask him if he is worried about her
safety there, he says “no”, but he is worried about her safety attending school
two miles from his home in an affluent suburban community in the US. His day
job includes being a leader for the quality program in his hospital, where he
searches the actual data for root and contributing causes to problems; he
wonders why this country cannot do the same for gun violence. Arizona Star columnist Dave Fitzsimmons expresses
similar fears for his children.
This country could, but so far it shows no sign of doing so.
Gibson quotes the author Chester Himes commenting on the lynching of 14-year
old Emmett Till in 1955 that “The real
horror comes when your dead brain must face the fact that we as a nation don’t
want it to stop.” Himes was talking about lynching, but it is clear that
the same can be said today, more than 60 years later, about school shootings.
We don’t want it to stop. Because, if we did, we would do something about it.
Of course, we do, most of us. Various surveys, asking the
question in different ways, find different percentages, but always large
majorities, of Americans want stricter gun laws, often up to 90%. Even most people
who are members of the NRA and/or are registered Republicans want limitations
on who can buy guns based on mental illness and other criteria (always “me, and
people like me”, but not the people like you) and some kinds of guns or gun
modifiers (like “bump stocks”, used by the Las Vegas shooter to turn his AR-15
semi-automatic – and by the way almost all these shootings involve AR-15s) and
armor-piercing bullets. No, the “we” who don’t want to stop it, in this case
is, beyond a small minority of zealots, the even smaller minority of those who
are politicians, in Congress, in the Executive Branch, and in our statehouses.
Why would they do this? Or, rather, not do anything about
gun violence? Well, there is a small minority of this small minority who are,
themselves, zealots whose interpretation of the Second Amendment is such that
our dead children are just collateral damage in pursuit of the higher cause of
unrestricted gun ownership. But, for most, opposition to even the most rational
restrictions is tied to money, specifically to money from the NRA. A staffer
for Jimmy Kimmel, Bess Kalb, looked
at how much each of the Senators and Congresspeople tweeting their sadness and
condolences took from the NRA, noting that “In the 2015-2016 election cycle
alone, GOP candidates took $17,385,437 from the NRA,” (quoting a tweet from
Republican National Convention chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel), and that
“This is NOT counting the $21 million given to President Trump.” Another
article documents the individual contributions, led by $4.4 million to Thom
Tillis (R-NC, or, excuse me, R-NRA).
These legislators, and sadly even the President, when not
crying their hypocritical crocodile tears and then voting with the NRA to kill
any sort of gun reform, talk instead about the need to focus on mental health.
This, by the way, is a good idea; the mental health system in this country is
terrible; insurance companies cover it inadequately, those who are not insured
and need public facilities find them cut back yearly, and there is no shortage
of news stories focusing on a poor mentally-ill person pushed out of a
treatment facility found wandering the street, or worse. Our jails and prisons
have become our new mental hospitals, documented, for example, in this
comprehensive Atlantic article from
2015, “America’s
largest mental hospital is a jail”. However, it is not the diagnosed
mentally ill who commit these murders and mass murders. Most such murderers do
not have a diagnosis, although they probably suffer from “anger management
disorder” (not
in the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-IV),
but “intermittent
explosive disorder“ will be in DSM-V). This is important because it is the angry who commit these murders. An
article in Slate by Laura L. Hayes
from 2014,”How to Stop Violence; Mentally ill people
aren’t killers. Angry people are”, contains this persuasive data:
80
to 90 percent of murderers had prior police records, in contrast to 15 percent
of American adults overall. In a study of domestic murderers, 46 percent of the
perpetrators had had a restraining order against them at some time. Family
murders are preceded by prior domestic violence more than 90 percent of the
time.
Hayes concludes that “Violent crimes are committed by people
who lack the skills to modulate anger, express it constructively, and move
beyond it.” Sadly, this also describes many of the most virulent opponents of
gun control.
If anything could be even more sad than the fact that the
mass killing of our children is tacitly endorsed through inaction by our
political leaders, it is that it is only one face of the epidemic that is child
mortality in the US. This January, Ashish P. Thrakar and colleagues published “Child
Mortality In The US and 19 OECD Comparator Nations: A 50-Year Time-Trend
Analysis” in the journal Health
Affairs. The picture was bleak. The first sentence of their Abstract
summarizes their findings: “The United
States has poorer child health outcomes than other wealthy nations despite
greater per capita spending on health care for children.” Guns are part of
it, and the “social determinants of health”, a sanitized way of saying that in
the richest country in the world there are millions of children with inadequate
food, housing, warmth, safety, healthcare, and educational opportunities, are
ultimately the other causes. We may be the richest country in the world, but we
are also the most unequal in the developed world, and the increases in the
wealth of the top 0.1% does not “trickle down” to those in need.
Indeed, even the outrageous and disproportionate child
mortality rates in this country are not the whole story. As I have noted before
(Rising
white midlife mortality: what are the real causes and solutions?, November
14, 2015; Tom
Petty, the opioid epidemic and changing structural inequities in the US,
January 23, 2018) the US is the only wealthy country in which mortality rates
are rising, a completely shocking finding since, of course, it didn’t used to
be true. And this rising mortality is driven by the white non-Hispanic
population (although, it must continue to be said, that the absolute mortality
rate of minorities, and especially African-Americans, still exceeds that of
whites), and more particularly, poor whites.
In a terrific effort to try to explain to the international
community what is happening in the US, Steven Woolf recently wrote an editorial
for the BMJ, Failing Health of the United
States. He notes the causes of the increases in mortality (more than
opioids, more than guns, although these are major contributors), provides data,
and proposes solutions. “In theory,” he says,
…policy
makers would promote education, boost support for children and families,
increase wages and economic opportunity for the working class, invest in distressed
communities, and strengthen healthcare and behavioral health systems.
Politicians need to address these issues, and they need to
be made to do so. By us, the people they are supposed to work for, not the huge
money contributors like the NRA. But we can only do this if we stay angry, and
stay organized. We cannot heed calls to “not talk about this now” while
families are grieving, because it will, based on history, not be very long
before it happens again.
It is our job and we must take it on.
No comments:
Post a Comment